Blockchain project technical specification writing

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1306 services
Blockchain project technical specification writing
Medium
~3-5 business days
FAQ
Blockchain Development Services
Blockchain Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1238
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1167
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    867
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1080
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    563
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    829

Writing a Technical Specification for a Blockchain Project

A technical specification for a blockchain project is fundamentally different from a spec for a regular web service: you need to specify smart contracts, their interaction, upgrade strategy, gas optimization, and infrastructure. A poorly developed spec leads to cardinal changes during development — in crypto this is especially expensive due to audits.

Blockchain Project Specification Structure

1. System Overview

  • Project goal and key stakeholders
  • Chosen blockchain and justification
  • High-level architecture (diagram)
  • Integration with external systems (oracles, bridges, other protocols)

2. Smart Contracts

For each contract:

Contract: LiquidityPool
Network: Arbitrum One
Standards: ERC-20 compatible
Upgradeability: UUPS proxy

Functions:
- deposit(uint256 amount) — deposit tokens, mint LP shares
- withdraw(uint256 shares) — burn LP shares, get tokens + accumulated fees
- swap(address tokenIn, uint256 amountIn, uint256 minAmountOut) — token swap

Events:
- Deposit(address indexed user, uint256 amount, uint256 shares)
- Withdraw(address indexed user, uint256 shares, uint256 amount)
- Swap(address indexed user, address tokenIn, uint256 amountIn, uint256 amountOut)

Roles (Access Control):
- DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE: Gnosis Safe 3/5
- PAUSE_ROLE: Protocol Defender (multisig or automated)
- FEE_MANAGER_ROLE: DAO timelock

Parameters (configurable):
- swapFee: 0.3% (range: 0.01%-1%)
- protocolFeeShare: 20% of swap fee

3. Token Specification (if applicable)

Token: PROTO
Standard: ERC-20 + ERC-2612 (Permit)
Supply: 100,000,000 (fixed)
Decimals: 18
Mintable: no (fixed supply)
Burnable: yes (holder can burn)
Pausable: yes (PAUSE_ROLE)
Distributor: special Vesting contract

4. Off-chain Components

  • Indexer (The Graph subgraph) — which events are indexed, GraphQL schema
  • Backend API (if needed) — endpoints, authentication
  • Frontend — technical stack, wallet integration

5. Infrastructure

Deployment:
- Foundry Deploy Scripts + Hardhat for verification
- Multisig owner: Gnosis Safe 3/5
- Timelock: 48 hours for admin functions
- Proxy: UUPS (implementation upgrade via timelock)

Monitoring:
- OpenZeppelin Defender for alerts
- Tenderly for transaction simulation
- The Graph for historical data

Networks for deployment:
- Testnet: Arbitrum Sepolia
- Mainnet: Arbitrum One

6. Security

  • List of smart contract patterns (Reentrancy guard, CEI, etc.)
  • Oracle manipulation protection
  • Flash loan attack vectors
  • Access control scheme
  • Upgrade strategy and timelock

7. Testing

Unit tests (Foundry):
- All public functions
- Edge cases and boundary conditions
- Revert scenarios

Fuzz tests:
- Invariants: "totalShares * pricePerShare = totalAssets"
- Random deposit/withdraw sequences

Fork tests:
- Integration with real protocols on mainnet fork

Coverage target: 95%+

8. Audit Plan

  • Audit scope (which contracts)
  • Timeline (audit after code freeze, before mainnet)
  • Readiness criteria (all medium+ findings fixed)

Common Mistakes in Specification

No role specification: "only owner can call function" — but is owner an EOA, multisig, or DAO?

No upgrade strategy: developers decide during development — risk of incompatible decisions.

No target gas budget: contract is written, then it turns out each call costs $50 gas.

No failure scenarios described: what happens if oracle is unavailable, if counterparty doesn't implement interface.

Writing a technical specification for a blockchain project: 1-2 weeks. Includes architecture diagrams, contract specifications, infrastructure requirements.