Blockchain structured products development

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1306 services
Blockchain structured products development
Complex
from 2 weeks to 3 months
FAQ
Blockchain Development Services
Blockchain Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1238
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1167
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    867
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1080
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    563
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    829

Blockchain Structured Products Development

Structured products are financial instruments with predetermined risk/return profile. In TradFi, this is a note with capital protection linked to an index, or autocallable with a barrier. On blockchain, the same mechanics is implemented via smart contracts, adding programmable payouts, transparency, and composability — but also fundamentally new technical risks.

Ribbon Finance protocol (vault-style structured products based on options) became a blueprint for doing it right: all mechanics on-chain, settlement via Opyn oTokens, risks explicitly described in code. Still, even Ribbon faced pricing and liquidity issues during extreme volatility.

Mechanics of Structured Products on Blockchain

Principal Protection via On-Chain Bond Mechanics

Classic structured product: 90% of capital goes to "risk-free" instrument (principal protection), 10% to upside option. On blockchain there's no risk-free asset, but there are approximations:

  • Lending in Aave/Compound at 4-8% APY in USDC
  • Liquidity provision in Curve stablecoin pools (1-3% APY)
  • Tokenized treasury bills (USDY from Ondo, BUIDL from BlackRock) on supported chains

Contract calculates split at deposit: how much to invest in yield instrument now to have 100% of initial deposit at maturity. Remainder goes to options strategy.

Math: for 12-month product at 6% Aave yield principal portion = deposit / 1.06. At $10,000 deposit — $9,434 in Aave, $566 for options component.

Problem: yield rate in Aave is not fixed. Over 12 months it can drop to 1%, and contract won't collect enough for principal protection. Solution — either fix yield via interest rate swap (on-chain via Pendle), or conservative estimate with buffer.

Payoff Structures and Their Solidity Implementation

Capital protected note — simplest case:

payoff = max(principal, principal + principal * max(0, assetReturn - strike))

Barrier product — more complex:

if price NOT touches barrier during entire period → payoff = principal + coupon
if price touches barrier → payoff = principal * (finalPrice / initialPrice)

On-chain continuous barrier monitoring is impossible without high-frequency oracle. Chainlink updates price every 0.5% deviation or once hourly — not continuous. Solution: discrete barriers (check daily/weekly by oracle snapshot) or European knock-in/knock-out (check only at expiry).

Autocallable — most complex:

  • Each period (month/quarter) autocall condition is checked
  • If met — product redeemed early with coupon
  • If not — continues

For on-chain implementation, need keeper (Chainlink Automation or Gelato) to automatically check conditions at each observation date. Missed observation = incorrect product behavior.

Settlement and Derivatives Integration

For options component: Opyn oToken standard (ERC-20 token representing claim on payout at strike), Lyra positions, or custom contracts.

Main risk — counterparty risk at settlement. If options protocol is hacked when your structured product holds significant position — principal at risk. Diversification across multiple options protocols or using only battle-tested solutions reduces this risk.

Tokenization and Lifecycle Management

ERC-1155 for Structured Notes

Each product issuance (series) — separate token ID in ERC-1155. This allows:

  • Trading on secondary market
  • Using as collateral in other DeFi protocols
  • Tracking historical issuances in one contract

tokenId encodes issuance parameters: series | strike | maturity. At mint, underlying price snapshot is fixed via oracle — this is initial price for return calculation.

Vault Architecture

Following Ribbon Finance pattern — each product is a vault:

StructuredProductFactory
  └── ProductVault (per series)
        ├── DepositModule
        ├── StrategyModule (yield + options)
        ├── SettlementModule
        └── WithdrawModule

Funds lock period is critical parameter. While product is active, funds are locked in contract. Emergency exit via multisig with timelock — for extreme cases (underlying protocol hack).

Pricing and NAV

NAV (Net Asset Value) for structured product consists of:

  1. Current value of yield position (Aave aToken at current rate)
  2. Current value of options position (Black-Scholes mark-to-market)
  3. Minus accumulated fees

On-chain NAV calculation with Black-Scholes requires fixed-point math and current volatility from oracle. Alternative — off-chain NAV calculation with on-chain verification via Merkle proof (as Backed Finance does for tokenized securities).

Regulatory Considerations

Structured products in most jurisdictions are regulated financial instruments. On-chain implementation doesn't change legal status of the product. Project must have legal opinion before launching public product. Technically not our task — but important to flag to client at start.

Development Process

Financial Engineering (1 week). Payoff math, stress-testing in Python (Monte Carlo simulation for various scenarios). Verify principal protection works in realistically bad scenarios.

Contract Architecture (3-5 days). Vault structure, integrations with yield and options protocols, keeper mechanics.

Development (4-6 weeks). Foundry + tests on all payoff scenarios. Fork tests with real Aave, Chainlink integrations.

Audit (4-8 weeks). Financial contracts require careful audit. Special attention — settlement math and oracle dependencies.

Timeline Estimates

Simple capital protected vault (yield + covered call) — 6-8 weeks development. Multi-series product with autocallable mechanics and secondary market trading — 2-3 months. Integration with multiple yield and derivative protocols increases timelines and audit scope.